home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
101992
/
10199932.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
6KB
|
142 lines
<text id=92TT2369>
<title>
Oct. 19, 1992: "People Vote for Presidents, . . .
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Oct. 19, 1992 The Homestretch: Clinton in Control
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
COVER STORIES, Page 37
THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
"People Vote for Presidents, Not Vice Presidents"
</hdr><body>
<p>DAN QUAYLE speaks out on abortion, the environment and Al Gore
</p>
<p>By MICHAEL DUFFY and Dan Quayle.
</p>
<p> Q. Please size up Al Gore.
</p>
<p> A. He's a very good debater. He was a good debater in the
Senate, a good debater in the House, does his homework. [But]
he and I disagree on almost every issue.
</p>
<p> Q. Do Vice Presidents matter much in this race?
</p>
<p> A. The American people vote for the President. The American
people vote for the top of the ticket, where obviously the Vice
President, or Vice Presidents, can help -- they can help with
the core constituency out there. The bottom line is, people vote
for Presidents, not Vice Presidents.
</p>
<p> Q. What are the two or three accomplishments as Vice
President of which you are proudest?
</p>
<p> A. One, working to advance the President's agenda on
Capitol Hill. Representing the President in 47 countries around
the world. Traveling to all 50 states, helping out with
political responsibilities. Heading the Competitiveness Council,
heading the Space Council. Probably the most important event was
monitoring the Philippine crisis when the President was in
Malta.
</p>
<p> Q. Was it a mistake to overemphasize family values in
Houston?
</p>
<p> A. The media have given more discussion to speeches other
than the speech that I made, or other than the speech that the
President made. [Ours] were the two main speeches. As a matter
of fact, I've heard very little discussion of my speech, and not
much more discussion on the President's speech. [Coverage]
focused on these peripheral issues, and I think that is just
simply the media trying to figure out a way to unfairly
criticize the convention and criticize the President. I don't
see people going back and looking at what Jesse Jackson said and
what Jerry Brown said at the Democratic Convention, but you sure
hear that review of the Republican Convention, so I just chalk
it up as one more unfair attack on the President.
</p>
<p> Q. You gave what many people considered the best speech of
your life in Houston. Had people not been paying attention to
you, or were you the beneficiary of low expectations?
</p>
<p> A. Others have to answer that. I spent quite a bit of time
writing the speech. I was trying to make it topical but also
defining the issue very clearly. It was not a much different
speech than what I've given out on the campaign trail. The fact
is that people don't focus on the Vice President, and I think
in many people's mind the image is still back in the '88
campaign; this is 1992.
</p>
<p> Q. The President has been saying that Bill Clinton has no
experience in foreign policy. Is that an argument that you think
is going to work with the American people at a time when the
economy seems to be the issue foremost in their minds?
</p>
<p> A. The economy is the first issue, but international
economics is very important. International economics will play
a great role in creating new jobs and opportunities. This
President knows every leader -- almost every leader in the world
on a first-name basis. He's the one that can sit down,
negotiate free-trade agreements, knock down tariffs, knock down
barriers, create a world environment of free, fair trade rather
than protectionism, and if you travel the road that Bill Clinton
wants to travel, it will be much more of a protectionist road
that will cost us jobs; small businesses will be denied export
opportunities, jobs will be lost, and our country will suffer.
</p>
<p> Q. On the environment, you have said that it is better to
emphasize jobs over the environment and at other times you have
said that there doesn't need to be a trade-off between the two.
Could you clarify your position?
</p>
<p> A. I think it's a false choice to say you can't have a
strong environment and a strong economy. I think you can have
both. Our emphasis, our approach -- just like we dealt with the
spotted owl, you send legislation to the Congress that will
preserve the spotted owl in its natural habitat and preserve
17,000 jobs. We have both, but unfortunately, the Democratic
Congress is only interested in preserving the owl. The owl is
important, but so are jobs. [The Democrats] are the ones that
are basically saying we can only have a strong environment, and
we can't have a strong economy as well.
</p>
<p> Q. Could you clarify your position on abortion? You have
recently begun to indicate that it was a matter that you would
leave to the states.
</p>
<p> A. My position on abortion is one that I've always had, a
pro-life position. I am opposed to abortion. I think abortion
is wrong. I have said that what we need to do is focus more, and
reflect more on the issues of abortion. That is precisely what
the Pennsylvania statute calls for -- a 24-hour waiting period,
parental notification of a minor. In Los Angeles I was talking
to a woman who had an abortion at age 17, and she told me that
she wished when she was 17 years old that someone would have
told her what the postabortion trauma was going to be like.
Looking back on it she wished that she had not chosen abortion,
and she told me, "If I had time to reflect on it over the
24-hour waiting period, I might not have had that abortion."
That's what I'm talking about -- changing attitudes, changing
behavior.
</p>
<p> Q. Are you suggesting that we don't need a ban on abortion?
</p>
<p> A. My focus today is the pro-life position of reflecting on
the issue of abortion, trying to have the choice of life rather
than abortion.
</p>
<p> Q. If you became President tomorrow morning, what would you
do?
</p>
<p> A. It really isn't appropriate for me as Vice President to
talk to you about what I'd do as President, other than to say
that I would continue to advance the agenda of George Bush.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>